Heading 1

Ask a fundamental analyst how they reached a target price and you'll hear about the earnings, the revenue build, the margins, the competitive position, the channel checks.

Weeks of work.

Then ask how they reached the multiple, and the answer is usually a sentence.

That asymmetry is the gap. The multiple does about half the work in a valuation, and it's where macro quietly enters a bottom-up portfolio.

A multiple is just a DCF collapsed into a single number, and that number can only be doing two jobs: how much bigger the earnings stream gets (growth, which is the economy) and what you knock off for waiting and risk (the discount rate, which is markets).

Neither is a fact about the company.

2022 is the clean test:
S&P 500 earnings were broadly flat; prices fell anyway. Run Qi's MFERM factor attribution over the year and the discount rate accounts for 96% of the drawdown — while stock selection actually added value, +2.1 points, against an 18% index loss.

Good stock picking read as a broken thesis, because the exposure doing the damage was never measured.

Our new note works through why the multiple is largely a macro object, and what it takes to own that exposure rather than inherit it.

Not a call to forecast GDP. An argument for measurement.


Click Download to read more

‍